4.6 Article

Anti-biofouling ability and cytocompatibility of the zwitterionic brushes-modified cellulose membrane

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 2, 期 41, 页码 7222-7231

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4tb01151a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA03Z445]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blood compatibility and cytocompatibility are key requirements of blood-contacting biomaterials for biomedical applications. Here, we showed the general zwitterionic surface modification of cellulose membrane (CM) substrates, via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP), to enhance the anti-biofouling ability without compromising the cytocompatibility of the substrates. Robust X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization revealed the successful construction of three zwitterionic brushes, which significantly increased the hydrophilicity of the CM substrates. The zwitterionic brushes-modified CM substrates can significantly reduce the non-specific adsorption of proteins, platelet adhesion and cell attachment, indicating a generally and significantly improved antibiofouling ability, which is comparable to that of the benchmark anti-fouling poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface. Inspired by the varied in situ cell morphology observed on different substrates, we further investigated the cytocompatibility of the zwitterionic coatings and showed the general cytocompatibility of zwitterionic brush-modified CM surfaces based on both 2D (cell cultured with zwitterionic surfaces) and 3D cell cultures (cell encapsulation in zwitterionic hydrogels). This work provides a promising general approach to enhancing the blood compatibility of cellulose-based materials without compromising their cytocompatibility. The cytocompatibility observation may enrich the perceptions of the zwitterionic modification of substrates and may be beneficial for the in vivo applications of zwitterionic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据