4.6 Article

Mn2+-doped NaYF4:Yb/Er upconversion nanoparticles with amplified electrogenerated chemiluminescence for tumor biomarker detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 2, 期 38, 页码 6626-6633

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4tb00717d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials
  2. National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomedical Functional Materials
  3. Base of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK 20131396]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Universities of Jiangsu Province [14KJA150006]
  5. production, education and research of the prospective joint research project of Jiangsu Province [BY2011109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemiluminescence was used as an excitation light source to construct a universal photoelectrochemical platform based on Mn2+-doped NaYF4:Yb/Er upconversion nanoparticles, which greatly improves the electrochemiluminescence intensity and offers more stable cathodic signals compared to pure NaYF4:Yb/Er NPs. Here, we report for the first time the ECL behaviors of Mn2+-doped NaYF4:Yb/Er NPs, which were synthesized via a facile strategy. Mn2+ doping resulted in a 4-fold ECL intensity enhancement of NaYF4:Yb/Er. The characteristics of Mn2+-doped NaYF4:Yb/Er nanocomposites were obtained using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS), and fluorescence spectra. After all the results had indicated that NaYF4:Yb/Er upconversion nanoparticles were successfully doped with Mn2+, the electrochemiluminescence platform was built. The as-prepared NaYF4:Yb/Er NPs were rendered water-soluble and then employed as ECL emitters for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) determination. The results indicated that the modified electrode can be used to determine CEA without interference from non-specific proteins, with a low detection limit of 5.2 pg mL(-1). The biosensor can also be used for quantification of the CEA concentration in real samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据