4.6 Article

In situ synthesis and biocompatibility of nano hydroxyapatite on pristine and chitosan functionalized graphene oxide

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 475-484

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2tb00053a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA030103]
  2. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2009CB930004, 2012CB619102]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070846, 30870623]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by the success of using graphene oxide (GO) as a nanofiller of composites, there is a drive to search for this new kind of carbon material as a reinforcing phase in biocomposites. In the present work, graphene oxide and chitosan (CS) functionalized graphene oxide were introduced as templates to fabricate hydroxyapatite (HA) using a facile solution-based in situ synthesis method, and GO-HA and CS-GO-HA nanocomposites were successfully prepared for the first time. It was found that the spindle like HA nanoparticles with a diameter of about 27 +/- 7 nm and a length around 150 +/- 25 nm were decorated randomly and strongly on the surface or aggregated at the edges of the pristine and chitosan functionalized GO matrix. Compared with HA, the prepared GO-based HA nanocomposites displayed an increased elastic modulus and hardness. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the prepared nanocomposites was investigated using CCK-8 assay on murine fibroblast L-929 cell line and human osteoblast-like MG-63 cell line, respectively. Both of the nanocomposites exhibited a high cell proliferation rate for L-929 and MG-63, and the CS-GO-HA could provide significantly higher cell viability and alkaline phosphatase activity compared to the GO-HA composite. These findings may provide new prospects for utilizing the GO-based hydroxyapatite biocomposites in bone repair, bone augmentation, as well as coating of biomedical implants and broaden the application of GO sheets in biological areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据