4.6 Article

Magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds: preparation, physicochemistry and biological properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 1, 期 9, 页码 1279-1288

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2tb00262k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51102166]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [11PJ1407300]
  4. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [12ZZ140]
  5. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [212055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnetic 10Fe5Ca MBG scaffolds (Fe3O4-CaO-SiO2-P2O5 system) have been prepared by a combination of polyurethane sponge and P123 as co-templates and an evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) process through the substitution of Fe3O4 for CaO in the 15Ca MBG scaffolds (CaO-SiO2-P2O5 system). The structure, magnetic heating, drug release, physicochemical and biological properties were systematically investigated. The results showed that the 10Fe5Ca MBG scaffolds had the interconnected macroporous structure with pore sizes ranging from 200 to 400 mu m and the mesoporous wall with a peak pore size of ca. 3.34 nm. Also, the 10Fe5Ca MBG scaffolds exhibited similar mechanical strength, apatite-forming ability and sustained drug release behavior compared to the 15Ca MBG scaffolds. Importantly, the substitution of Fe3O4 for CaO in the MBG scaffolds induced a slower ion dissolution rate and more significant potential to stabilize the pH environment, and facilitated osteoblast cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteogenic expression. In particular, the 10Fe5Ca MBG scaffolds could generate heat in an alternating magnetic field. Therefore, the magnetic 10Fe5Ca MBG scaffolds have potential for the regeneration of the critical-size bone defects caused by bone tumors by a combination of magnetic hyperthermia and local drug delivery therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据