4.6 Article

Influence of dopant size and electron affinity on the electrical conductivity and thermoelectric properties of a series of conjugated polymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 34, 页码 16495-16505

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta05922e

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1729737, DMR-1454200, 1653909]
  3. Purdue University
  4. DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical doping is widely used to manipulate the electrical and thermoelectric properties of organic semiconductors, yet intelligent design of polymer-dopant systems remains elusive. It is challenging to predict the electrical and thermoelectric properties of doped organic semiconductors due to the large number of variables impacting these properties, including film morphology, dopant and polymer energetics, dopant size, and degree of polaron delocalization. Herein, a series of dopants with varying sizes and electron affinities (EAs) are combined with polymers of differing ionization energies (IEs) to investigate how the difference between polymer IE and dopant EA influences the doping efficiency and electrical conductivity, and how the dopant size influences the thermoelectric properties. Our experiments demonstrate that at low doping levels the doping efficiency strongly depends on the difference between the polymer IE and dopant EA; the effectiveness of doping on increasing electrical conductivity drastically decreases at high loadings for the molybdenum dithiolene complexes, while FeCl3 remains effective at high loadings; and the large molybdenum complexes lead to more delocalized polarons as compared to FeCl3. To take advantage of the complementary doping characteristics of the molybdenum complexes and FeCl3, both dopants are employed simultaneously to reach high power factors at relatively low dopant concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据