4.6 Article

Metallo-supramolecular polymer engineered porous carbon framework encapsulated stable ultra-small nanoparticles: a general approach to construct highly dispersed catalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 34, 页码 16680-16689

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta05369c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2017YFC0906902, 2017ZX09301032]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621003]
  3. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [129/2017/A3, 089/2013/A3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a general approach for fabricating stable ultra-small heterogeneous nanocatalysts has been intensively pursued. However, issues related to complex synthesis processes and structural stability have restricted their investigation and application. Here we report a facile organometallic conjunction strategy for the large-scale fabrication of porous carbon framework encapsulated highly dispersed sub-3 nm ultra-small nanoparticles (USMNPs@PCF). This methodology is based on the convenient aldol condensation reaction to manufacture a metallo-supramolecular polymer precursor and then consequent annealing to form the target nanocomposite. This technique was successfully applied to the preparation of varieties of USMNPs@PCF, including Fe, Co, Ni, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd and Pt. As a representative application, the PCF encapsulated sub-3 nm Pd nanoparticles demonstrated remarkable durability and efficiency for chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroarenes to their corresponding anilines under ambient conditions with low catalyst loading. All hydrogenation reactions can complete in 4 min with >99% conversion and >99% chemoselectivity. The turnover frequency (TOF) was up to 11400 h(-1) for p-nitrophenol. This work provides a general, scalable and economical route for the manufacture of sub-3 nm and highly dispersed nanocomposites, which can be used in many other important fields, such as electrochemistry, energy science and environmental protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据