4.6 Article

Crystallographic orientation-surface energy-wetting property relationships of rare earth oxides

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 38, 页码 18384-18388

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta04938f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Summer Program
  3. Mitacs
  4. JSPS [17H01314]
  5. Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [12024046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling the wetting property of ceramics, which is characterized by their water contact angles (WCAs), is of great interest because of their better thermal and chemical robustness compared with polymer materials. Among many ceramics, rare earth oxides (REOs) have attracted attention because of their high WCA (similar to 115 degrees). Although several non-wetting mechanisms of REOs have been proposed thus far, the intrinsic mechanism has not been clarified yet due to the lack of information on crystallographic orientation-surface energy (SE)-WCA relationships. Here we report the WCA of (001), (110), and (111) oriented REO epitaxial films, which have different surface energies. We found that the WCA of fresh REO epitaxial film surfaces, which were prepared using a pulsed laser deposition technique, strongly depends on the crystallographic orientations, WCA((111)) > WCA((110)) > WCA((001)), which reflects the differences in surface energy; SE(111) < SE(110) < SE(001). Moreover, we found that the WCA on REOs increases rapidly and converges to about 80 degrees upon exposure to ambient air, regardless of the crystallographic orientation, likely due to surface adsorption of airborne carbon species. The present finding of 'There is a strong correlation between the crystallographic orientation, wetting property and the surface energy' is of great importance for the understanding of the wetting properties of ceramics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据