4.6 Article

Safe preparation, energetic performance and reaction mechanism of corrosion-resistant Al/PVDF nanocomposite films

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 36, 页码 17713-17723

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta05758c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706105]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170846]
  3. Qing Lan Project
  4. Weapon Research Support Fund [62201070827]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  6. Basic Product Innovation Technology Research Project of Explosives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, to improve the safety in the preparation process of energetic materials, vacuum freeze-drying technology is applied to develop nanoenergetic thin films in which Al nanoparticles (Al NPs) are used as the fuel and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) powders act as the oxidant. The whole process effectively avoids high temperature and thus ensures operational safety. The morphology and composition characterizations confirm that Al NPs are dispersed uniformly in the hydrophobic energetic binder, endowing the films with increased water-proof, anti-aging and anti-corrosion characteristics. The results of thermal analysis show that a pre-ignition reaction (PIR) destroys the Al2O3 shell and a sharp exothermic peak from the reaction between the exposed Al core and PVDF is found before the melting point of Al. Combustion tests reveal that the film with the highest content of Al NPs possesses the fastest flame propagation speed. The preliminary reaction mechanism obtained by probing the reaction products and intermediates suggests that a two-step reaction exists when the film is slowly heated in N-2, while a competitive reaction between oxidation and fluorination of Al NPs is observed when the film burns in air. These results indicate the promising potential of vacuum freeze-drying technology in manufacturing nanoenergetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据