4.6 Article

Controllable synthesis of RGO/FexOy nanocomposites as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 25, 页码 9844-9850

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta01804d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20504026]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [13ZR1411900]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B502]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory Project [08DZ2230500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene/metal oxide composites have attracted considerable attention for various applications, such as energy storage, catalysts, and electronics, however, the lack of effective and environmentally friendly fabrication methods for obtaining uniform graphene/metal oxide nanocomposites on a large scale has been one of the main technical barriers to real applications. We have developed a simple, efficient, and environmentally benign approach to the synthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/metal oxide composites via hydrothermal reaction of graphene oxide and metal powder under mild reaction conditions. For iron oxide as an example, by controlling the ratio of graphene oxide to Fe powder (m(GO)/m(Fe)), the hydrothermal temperature, and the addition of a mild oxidizing/reducing agent, the valence of Fe in the iron oxide products can be well tuned, i.e., various iron oxide/RGO composites, including RGO/Fe3O4, RGO/Fe3O4/Fe2O3, and RGO/Fe2O3, could be synthesized. RGO/FexOy composites in this study deliver a Li-ion storage capacity of 988.5 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 100 mA g(-1). After cycling at 500 mA g(-1) for 300 cycles, a capacity of 868.4 mA h g(-1) can still be maintained (with no capacity decay). When the current density is 2000 mA g(-1), the capacity of 657.0 mA h g(-1) is still retained, showing superior rate capability. The work described here provides a promising pathway to construct various graphene-based metal oxides as electrode materials for Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据