4.6 Article

A fluorene based covalent triazine framework with high CO2 and H-2 capture and storage capacities

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 16, 页码 5928-5936

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta15417c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG [SPP 1362, SE 1417/5-1, LO 1801/2-1]
  2. Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM)
  3. Center for Nanoscience (CeNS)
  4. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI)
  5. International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Materials (IMPRS-AM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous organic polymers have come into focus recently for the capture and storage of postcombusted CO2. Covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) constitute a nitrogen-rich subclass of porous polymers, which offers enhanced tunability and functionality combined with high chemical and thermal stability. In this work a new covalent triazine framework based on fluorene building blocks is presented, along with a comprehensive elucidation of its local structure, porosity, and capacity for CO2 capture and H-2 storage. The framework is synthesized under ionothermal conditions at 300-600 degrees C using ZnCl2 as a Lewis acidic trimerization catalyst and reaction medium. Whereas the materials synthesized at lower temperatures mostly feature ultramicropores and moderate surface areas as probed by CO2 sorption (297 m(2) g(-1) at 300 degrees C), the porosity is significantly increased at higher synthesis temperatures, giving rise to surface areas in excess of 2800 m(2) g(-1). With a high fraction of micropores and a surface area of 1235 m(2) g(-1), the CTF obtained at 350 degrees C shows an excellent CO2 sorption capacity at 273 K (4.28 mmol g(-1)), which is one of the highest observed among all porous organic polymers. Additionally, the materials have CO2/N-2 selectivities of up to 37. The hydrogen adsorption capacity of 4.36 wt% at 77 K and 20 bar is comparable to that of other POPs, yet the highest among all CTFs studied to date.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据