4.6 Article

4,4′-Biphenyldicarboxylate sodium coordination compounds as anodes for Na-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 36, 页码 14986-14993

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta02424a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea CCS R&D Center (KCRC) - Korea government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2013M1A8A1039968]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government (MEST) [2010-0019408, NRF-2013R1A1A2013446]
  3. Research Fund of the UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel 4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylate (bpdc) sodium salts with different compositions were evaluated for the first time as anodes for Na-ion batteries, and their crystal structures and corresponding electrochemical performances were analyzed. The structure of the bpdc-sodium salts was modified using precipitation and solvothermal methods to afford three different crystal structures with different degrees of deprotonation of the carboxylic acid (COOH) groups and different coordination of the water molecule, as determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The extent of deprotonation in bpdc-sodium salts not only affects their electrochemical performance, but also affects the corresponding reaction mechanisms. The fully deprotonated bpdc-disodium salt exhibits a promising electrochemical performance with a reversible capacity of about 200 mA h g(-1) at ca. 0.5 V vs. Na/Na+, stable cycle performance over 150 cycles, and an excellent rate performance of 100 mA h g(-1) even at a 20 C rate, which are better than those of the partially deprotonated bpdc-sodium salt. The sodiation-desodiation of bpdc-sodium salts proceeds in a two-phase reaction, regardless of the degree of deprotonation. However, unlike the fully deprotonated bpdc-disodium salt, which shows a reversible phase transition during sodiation and desodiation, the partially deprotonated bpdc-sodium salt exhibits an irreversible phase transition during cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据