4.6 Article

Free-standing cobalt hydroxide nanoplatelet array formed by growth of preferential-orientation on graphene nanosheets as anode material for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 48, 页码 20706-20713

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta05073h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202009, 51272019]
  2. New Teachers' Fund for Doctor Stations, the Ministry of Education of China [20120010120004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jisangsu Province of China [BK20140269]
  4. Foundation of Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing City [YB20121001001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cobalt hydroxide arrays/graphene nanosheets (Co(OH)(2) array/GNSs) composites are formed by the growth of preferential-orientation versus basal planes of GNSs. Notably, the Co(OH)(2) nanoplates, possessing special hexagonal morphology with the length of about 130 nm and average thickness of about 20 nm, stand vertically rather than lie flat on the surface of graphene sheets. More interestingly, the (001) crystal plane of Co(OH)(2) is vertical to the graphene basal plane and forms strong covalent bond interaction (Co-C bond) with the graphene layer, which could be a driving force for the preferential growth of nanoarrays on graphene. Co(OH)(2) array/GNSs composites exhibit not only high specific capacity, but also outstanding high-rate performance when used as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. At the current density of 50 mA g(-1), the reversible capacity is 976 mA h g(-1) and remains at 1103 mA h g(-1) after 50 cycles without any fading. At 500 and 1000 mA g(-1), the reversible capacities can reach 696 and 496 mA h g(-1), which are 71% and 51% of that at 50 mA g(-1), respectively. Excellent electrochemical performance could be attributed to the array structure of Co(OH)(2) as well as a synergistic effect between Co(OH)(2) and graphene. Therefore, Co(OH)(2) array/GNSs composites are expected to have potential applications in LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据