4.6 Article

Perovskite processing for photovoltaics: a spectrothermal evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 45, 页码 19338-19346

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta04725g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Technology Strategy Board through the SPECIFIC Innovation and Knowledge Centre [EP/I019278/1, EP/K000292/1, EP/L010372/1]
  3. Welsh Government
  4. European Social Fund (ESF) through the European Union's Convergence programme
  5. EPSRC [EP/L010372/1, EP/K000292/1, EP/I019278/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L010372/1, EP/K000292/1, EP/I019278/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal analysis (TGA and DSC), coupled with evolved gas FTIR spectroscopy, has been used to study the changes occurring during, and differences between materials after, the annealing step of mixed-halide methylammonium lead halide perovskites. This is important because, to date, the material is the most efficient light harvester in highly efficient, 3rd generation perovskite photovoltaic devices, and processing plays a significant role in device performance. TGA-FTIR data show only solvent evolution during the annealing step, whilst post-annealing analysis shows that the resulting material still contains a significant amount of residual solvent; however, efficient DMF removal was possible using a silica gel desiccant for a period of 3 days. The data also show that methylammonium halide decomposition does not occur until temperatures well above those used for perovskite processing, suggesting that this is not a significant issue for device manufacture. The absence of a well-defined, reversible tetragonal - cubic phase change around 55 degrees C in the DSC data of the annealed material, and the presence of HCl in evolved gas analysed following thermal decomposition, demonstrates that CH3NH3I3-xClx does retain some Cl after annealing and does not simply form stoichiometric CH3NH3PbI3 as has been suggested by some workers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据