4.6 Article

First principles study of dopant solubility and defect chemistry in LiCoO2

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 29, 页码 11235-11245

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta01443j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research and Development Initiative for Scientific Innovation of New Generation Battery (RISING) project from New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping and alloying are extensively applied to electrode active materials to improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries. Thus, the defect formation energy and equilibrium concentrations of doped ions in LiCoO2 are estimated as extrinsic point defects, as well as those of the native defects, using first-principles calculations. Na, K, Rb, Mg, Ca, Sr, Zn, Al, Ga, In, Sc, Y, Zr and Nb are selected as the dopants with a variety of valences and ionic radii. Dopants with a solubility higher than 1% are Al and Ga for the Co site, and Na and Zn for the Li site at 1100 K and 0.2 atm oxygen pressure, without a significant increase in lithium deficiency. Mg shows a solubility of about 0.5% at both sites, and the preferential occupation site depends on conditions: the Co site under oxidative conditions, whereas the Li site is preferred under reductive conditions. The estimated dopant solubility indicates that the valences of the dopants are the predominant factor for the occupation sites, whereas the ionic radii have a significant effect on the solubility. The dopant solubility and defect concentrations strongly depend on the chemical potential. Therefore, an appropriate ratio of starting materials that provides the desirable chemical potentials is necessary to achieve the balance of high dopant solubility and low lithium deficiency. The present calculation, based on the first-principles calculations, can provide quantitative information about the balance of the defects and also about the proper synthetic and post-synthetic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据