4.6 Article

Low-temperature and one-pot synthesis of sulfurized graphene nanosheets via in situ doping and their superior electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 48, 页码 20714-20722

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta04938a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51272071, 21401049]
  2. Hubei Provincial Department of Science AMP
  3. Technology, China [2014CFA096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical doping of foreign atoms and functional moieties is a significant strategy for tailoring the electronic properties and enhancing the catalytic ability of graphene. However, the general approaches to the synthesis of heteroatom-doped graphene often involve chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and/or thermal annealing performed at high temperature under gas phases, which require special instruments and tedious process. In this study, we have developed a low temperature, economical, and facile one-pot hydrothermal method to synthesise sulfur-doped reduced graphene oxide (S-RGO) nanosheets, in which the sodium sulfide (Na2S) was employed not only as a sulfur source but also as a reductant to reduce the graphene oxide (GO) simultaneously with sulfur (S) being in situ doped into graphene frameworks. The as-prepared S-RGO has a high S content (4.19 at%), as well as high-quality sulfurated species (mainly as C-S-C-), and possesses numerous open edge sites and defects on its surface, which are beneficial for the improved ORR catalytic activity. Electrochemical characterizations clearly demonstrated the excellent electrical conductivity and superior electrocatalytic activity of S-RGO for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), coupled with considerably enhanced stability and methanol tolerance compared to the commercial Pt/C catalyst. The present low temperature and one-pot approach provides the possibility for the synthesis of S-RGO at the Gram-scale for its application in electronic nanodevices and electrode materials for fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据