4.6 Article

A facile preparation method of surface patterned polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 23, 页码 8652-8659

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta00674g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean government (MEST) [2009-C1AAA001-2009-0092926, 2007-0056091, NRF-2012R1A2A2A02011268]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2007-0056091] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a facile patterning method that facilitates production of large-area platforms with well-arrayed micro/nanopatterns of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) at low cost using an elastomeric mold at room temperature without hot-pressing. Membrane-electrode interfacial properties on the cathode side are controlled by the patterned structure of the membrane, which in turn directly affects the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) and Pt utilization of the catalyst. This confirmed that electrochemical properties improve the performance of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). A MEA fabricated with a 3 x 5 mu m (width x gap) micropatterned Nafion membrane exhibits a current density of 1.79 A cm(-2) at 0.6 V and a power density of 1.26 W cm(-2) at 75 degrees C; these values are 53% and 59% greater than those of the corresponding MEA without a patterned membrane, respectively, and are among the highest performances reported for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, use of a nanopatterned membrane decreases the performance due to insufficient infiltration of the ionomer into the grooved surface, leading to a poor mechanical/electrical contact between the membrane and the electrode. Membrane morphology and the structure of the membrane-electrode interface are characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and impedance spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据