4.6 Article

A magnetic field assisted self-assembly strategy towards strongly coupled Fe3O4 nanocrystal/rGO paper for high-performance lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 2, 期 25, 页码 9636-9644

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta00821a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRF of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2009-C1AAA001-2009-0094157, NRF-2013R1A2A1A09014038, 2009-0092950, 2011-0006268]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A1A09014038, 2009-0092951, 2009-0094157] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum sized nanocrystals (NCs) have theoretically provided higher electrochemical activity for lithium ion batteries than their bulk counterparts due to their large surface area and short diffusion distance for Li+ ions. With ever-increasing interest in the development of next-generation, high-performance and flexible LIBs, reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/quantum sized NC hybrid papers are being considered to be one of the promising configurations for these special needs. However, one of the challenges regarding this kind of hybrid paper is how to control the uniform size distribution and monodispersibility, as well as keeping it on rGO sheets individually separated. In this work, a remarkably high reversible capacity (1140 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 1 C) and long-term stability (at least 220 cycles) for lithium storage over a flexible rGO/Fe3O4 NC (similar to 2 nm) paper have been achieved. A viable polyelectrolyte-assisted synthesis of strongly coupled rGO/Fe3O4 hybrids has demonstrated the self-assembled magnetite hybrid paper at the air/liquid interface, with the help of an external magnetic field. Crystallographic and microscopic characterizations revealed that the Fe3O4 nanocrystals still retained high-crystallinity, well-dispersibility and original size after long-term cycles, with negligibly slight aggregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据