4.6 Article

Ordered mesoporous Co3O4 spinels as stable, bifunctional, noble metal-free oxygen electrocatalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 1, 期 34, 页码 9992-10001

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta11917c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education [NRF-2013R1A1A2012960]
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20094010200030]
  4. Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
  5. Global Ph.D. Fellowship [NRF-2013H1A2A1032644]
  6. National Junior Research Fellowship [NRF-2013H1A8A1003741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the use of noble metal-free ordered mesoporous Co3O4 spinels (meso-Co3O4), templated from KIT-6 mesoporous silica, as highly active and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for both oxygen evolution and reduction reactions (OER and ORR, respectively). The meso-Co3O4 nanostructures showed high activity for OER in an alkaline medium (0.1 M KOH), which makes them comparable to the most active Ir/C catalyst and better than Co3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) and the Pt/C catalyst. Furthermore, meso-Co3O4 exhibited enhanced stability, compared to Co3O4 NPs. The enhanced activity and stability of meso-Co3O4 over Co3O4 NPs could be attributed to its high surface area and structural stability of the gyroid network structure in the meso-Co3O4 catalysts. The meso-Co3O4 nanostructures also showed promising activity for ORR and exhibited a methanol-tolerance superior to the Pt/C catalyst. The total overpotential of meso-Co3O4 for OER (at 10 mA cm(-2)) and ORR (at -3 mA cm(-2)) was 1.034 V, which is on a par with noble metal-based catalysts. This work demonstrates that directing metal oxides into mesostructures is a promising means of preparing highly active, stable, bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts that can potentially replace expensive noble metal-based catalysts. This design strategy can be extended to other reactions relevant to energy conversion and storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据