4.6 Article

Polydopamine-assisted decoration of ZnO nanorods with Ag nanoparticles: an improved photoelectrochemical anode

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 1, 期 16, 页码 5045-5052

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta10499k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modification of zinc oxide (ZnO) with silver (Ag) has proven to be an effective strategy to enhance the optical and electrical properties, in which the interactions between ZnO and Ag are critically determined by the structure and morphology of the ZnO-Ag hybrids. In order to achieve homogeneous and controllable distribution, polydopamine (PDA) was introduced via in situ polymerization to assist the decoration of ZnO nanorods (NRs) with Ag nanoparticles (NPs). Compared with pristine ZnO NRs, the light absorption is significantly enhanced for the PDA assisted Ag-decorated ZnO, which is attributed to the Ag NPs as well as the carbonized PDA thin film. Ag NPs of small size enhance the multiple/high-angle scattering from localized plasmonic effect, which increases the light path length hence traps more light. The carbonized PDA film is further beneficial to the absorption of the visible light. The Ag-decorated ZnO NRs on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glasses were then used as photoanodes of the photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell. The short circuit current density (J(SC), 1.8 mA cm(-2)), maximum photo current conversion efficiency (PCE, 3.9%) and lifetime (3.07 mA cm(-2) at 500 seconds) are achieved with an optimized loading of Ag nanoparticles derived from 0.01 M silver nitrate (AgNO3), which are found to be much higher than those of pristine ZnO NRs and other reported Ag-ZnO-based photoanodes. The overall PEC performance improvement is attributed to the localized plasmonic effect enhanced light harvesting as well as the facilitated charge transport and inhibition of recombination of electrons and holes from both Ag nanoparticles that act as an electron acceptor and carbonized PDA film as stabilizer and separator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据