4.6 Article

Layered double hydroxide (LDH)-based monolith with interconnected hierarchical channels: enhanced sorption affinity for anionic species

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 1, 期 26, 页码 7702-7708

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ta11110e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [22360276, 24750206]
  2. Murata Scientific Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22360276] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monolithic layered double hydroxides (LDHs) with interconnected channels have been expected to enhance sorption rate as well as increase accumulation of anions. Although powder molding can form easily-handled LDH compacts, interconnected channel formation therein has not been achieved. Herein, we demonstrate cm-scale monolithic LDH-based composites with interconnected hierarchical channels via a spontaneous sol-gel reaction. The synthesis was performed on Mg-Al hydrotalcite-type LDHs starting from metal chlorides aqueous/ethanolic solution with poly(ethylene oxide) incorporated. Addition of propylene oxide triggers a sol-gel reaction to form monolithic xerogels with a formula of [ Mg0.66Al0.33(OH)(2)Cl-0.33 center dot 2.92H(2)O]center dot 3.1Al(OH)(3). LDH crystals together with aluminum hydroxide crystals homogeneously build up gel skeletons with well-defined hierarchical channels. The interconnected channel in mm range (macrochannel) are formed as a phase-separated structure, whereas the channel in nm range (nanochannel) are as interstices of primary particles. The channel architectures are preserved in the course of rehydration process, affording enhanced sorption affinity for anion species in the process. Both of macro and mesochannels as well as high charge density of the obtained LDHs (Mg/Al = 2.0) contribute to enhanced anion sorption in the monolithic xerogels. The materials obtained here opens up applications of high performance adsorbents and ion-storage free from diffusion limitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据