4.4 Article

The Thouless time for mass-deformed SYK

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2018)041

关键词

Matrix Models; Integrable Field Theories; Stochastic Processes; Black Holes

资金

  1. Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) within the program IPMU-KIAS-Kyunghee Univ. joint workshop
  2. International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) for participating in the program - Kavli Asian Winter School (KAWS) on Strings, Particles and Cosmology 2018 [ICTS/Prog-KAWS2018/01]
  3. Mandelstam Institute for Theoretical Physics within the program The Second Mandelstam Theoretical Physics School and Workshop
  4. International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [PG058902] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the onset of RMT dynamics in the mass-deformed SYK model (i.e. an SYK model deformed by a quadratic random interaction) in terms of the strength of the quadratic deformation. We use as chaos probes both the connected unfolded Spectral Form Factor (SFF) as well as the Gaussian-filtered SFF, which has been recently introduced in the literature. We show that they detect the chaotic/integrable transition of the mass-deformed SYK model at different values of the mass deformation: the Gaussian-filtered SFF sees the transition for large values of the mass deformation; the connected unfolded SFF sees the transition at small values. The latter shows a closer agreement with the transition as seen by the OTOCs. We argue that the chaotic/integrable deformation affects the energy levels inhomogeneously: for small values of the mass deformation only the low-lying states are modified while for large values of the mass deformation also the states in the bulk of the spectrum move to the integrable behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据