4.4 Article

Prospects for electroweakino discovery at a 100TeV hadron collider

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2014)108

关键词

Supersymmetry Phenomenology

资金

  1. NSF [1066293]
  2. Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP)
  3. Aspen Center for Theoretical Physics
  4. Center for Future High Energy Physics (CFHEP) in Beijing
  5. SLAC theory group
  6. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  7. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development Innovation
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2058449]
  9. DOE [DE-SC0003930, DE-SC0011719]
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011719] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  11. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2058449] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the prospects of discovering split Supersymmetry at a future 100TeV proton-proton collider through the direct production of electroweakino next-tolightest-supersymmetric-particles (NLSPs). We focus on signatures with multi-lepton and missing energy: 3l, opposite-sign dileptons and same-sign dileptons. We perform a comprehensive study of different electroweakino spectra. A 100TeV collider with 3000/ fb data is expected to exclude Higgsino thermal dark matter candidates with m(LSP) similar to 1TeV if Wino NLSPs are lighter than about 3.2TeV. The 3l search usually offers the highest mass reach, which varies in the range of (2-4) TeV depending on scenarios. In particular, scenarios with light Higgsinos have generically simplified parameter dependences. We also demonstrate that, at a 100TeV collider, lepton collimation becomes a crucial issue for NLSPs heavier than about 2.5TeV. We finally compare our results with the discovery prospects of gluino pair productions and deduce which SUSY breaking model can be discovered first by electroweakino searches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据