4.4 Article

Treating to target in established rheumatoid arthritis: Challenges and opportunities in an era of novel targeted therapies and biosimilars

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.10.001

关键词

Rheumatoid arthritis; Treat-to-target; Disease activity; Remission; Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; Biologics and biosimilars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing consensus that periodic monitoring of disease activity status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to achieve and maintain remission, or at least low disease activity (LDA), the so-called treat to target (T2T) improves outcomes regardless of the duration of disease. Based on systematic literature reviews (SLRs) of clinical trials and registries, International Recommendations published in 2015 represent expert opinion describing efficacy and safety of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (c5DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). A total of 10 recommendations are detailed from four Overarching Principles: (1) treatment decisions are shared between patient and rheumatologist; (2) the primary goalv is to maximize long-term quality of life by controlling the symptoms, preventing joint damage, and by normalizing the function and social and work participation; (3) abrogation (not just control) of inflammation is the most effective method to achieve this goal; (4) 121 by measuring disease activity regularly and adjusting therapy to achieve remission/LDA optimizes outcomes in RA. The SLRs provide solid evidence that methotrexate is the anchor of csDMARD and that step-up therapy by adding/substituting other csDMARDs, such as sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), on and leflunomide (LEF) is as effective as combination therapy to initiate. Tofacitinib, a recently marketed csDMARD, may be more effective in comparison to MTX, and can be used in combination. Rapid disease control can be achieved by bridging with various regimens of glucocorticoids (GCs), but tapering to doses <= 7.5 mg/day is critical to limit side effects. In practice settings, use of bDMARDs is influenced by reimbursement Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are highly used, but as more data emerge, there appear to be no major differences to more recently available targeted bDMARD monoclonal antibodies such as abatacept (co-stimulation blockade), rituximab (B cell depleting), tocilizumab (TCZ) (interleukin (IL)-6 receptor blockade). Rituximab appears to be most effective for seropositive patients, and tocilizumab may be more effective as a monotherapy in patients intolerant to csDMARDs. Besides T2T, attention to managing treatment and optimizing outcomes should take into account potential adverse effects, such as risk of serious infection, as well as potential morbidity/mortality related to cardiovascular events, pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, and flbromyalgia which often influence some measures, such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据