3.9 Article

Vector space architecture for emergent interoperability of systems by learning from demonstration

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bica.2014.11.015

关键词

Communications; Interoperability; Vector symbolic architecture; Sparse distributed memory; Artificial intelligence; System of systems

资金

  1. Nordeas Norriandsstiftelse
  2. Wallenberg Foundation
  3. ARTEMIS Arrowhead Project
  4. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) [IG2011-2025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid integration of physical systems with cyberspace infrastructure, the so-called Internet of Things, is likely to have a significant effect on how people interact with the physical environment and design information and communication systems. Internet-connected systems are expected to vastly outnumber people on the planet in the near future, leading to grand challenges in software engineering and automation in application domains involving complex and evolving systems. Several decades of artificial intelligence research suggests that conventional approaches to making such systems automatically interoperable using handcrafted semantic descriptions of services and information are difficult to apply. In this paper we outline a bioinspired learning approach to creating interoperable systems, which does not require handcrafted semantic descriptions and rules. Instead, the idea is that a functioning system (of systems) can emerge from an initial pseudorandom state through learning from examples, provided that each component conforms to a set of information coding rules. We combine a binary vector symbolic architecture (V5A) with an associative memory known as sparse distributed memory (SDM) to model context-dependent prediction by learning from examples. We present simulation results demonstrating that the proposed architecture can enable system interoperability by learning, for example by human demonstration. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据