4.4 Article

Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2011)026

关键词

Gauge-gravity correspondence; AdS-CFT Correspondence

资金

  1. WIMCS
  2. STFC [ST/G000506/1]
  3. STFC [ST/J00040X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J00040X/1, ST/G000506/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider a general five-dimensional sigma-model coupled to gravity, with any number of scalars and general sigma-model metric and potential. We discuss in detail the problem of the boundary conditions for the scalar fluctuations, in the case where the fifth dimension is compact, and provide a simple (and very general) algorithmic procedure for computing the spectrum of physical scalar fluctuations of the fully back-reacted system. Focusing in particular on the conditions under which the spectrum of scalar excitations (glueballs) contains parametrically light states, we apply the formalism to some especially simple toy models, which can be thought of as the gauge/gravity duals of strongly-coupled, non-conformal four-dimensional gauge theories. Our examples are chosen both within the context of phenomenological effective field theory constructions (bottom-up approach), and within the context of consistent truncations of ten-dimensional string theories in the supergravity limit (top-down approach). In one of the examples, a light dilaton is present in the spectrum in spite of the presence of a bad naked singularity in the deep IR, near which the RG flow of the dual theory is certainly very far away from any fixed point. If this feature were to persist in a complete model in which the singularity is resolved, this would prove that a light dilaton is to be expected in at least certain walking technicolor theories. We provide here all the technical details for testing this statement, once such a complete model is identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据