4.4 Article

Flavourful production at hadron colliders

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2011)055

关键词

Beyond Standard Model; Phenomenological Models; Hadronic Colliders

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation [NSF-PHY-0910467]
  2. Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics
  3. STFC [ST/J000434/1, ST/G000581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000581/1, ST/J000434/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Physics [910467] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We ask what new states may lie at or below the TeV scale, with sizable flavour-dependent couplings to light quarks, putting them within reach of hadron colliders via resonant production, or in association with Standard Model states. In particular, we focus on the compatibility of such states with stringent flavour-changing neutral current and electric-dipole moment constraints. We argue that the broadest and most theoretically plausible flavour structure of the new couplings is that they are hierarchical, as are Standard Model Yukawa couplings, although the hierarchical pattern may well be different. We point out that, without the need for any more elaborate or restrictive structure, new scalars with diquark couplings to standard quarks are particularly immune to existing constraints, and that such scalars may arise within a variety of theoretical paradigms. In particular, there can be substantial couplings to a pair of light quarks or to one light and one heavy quark. For example, the latter possibility may provide a flavour-safe interpretation of the asymmetry in top quark production observed at the Tevatron. We thereby motivate searches for diquark scalars at the Tevatron and LHC, and argue that their discovery represents one of our best chances for new insight into the Flavour Puzzle of the Standard Model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据