4.4 Article

Factorization at subleading power and irreducible uncertainties in (B)over-bar → Xsγ decay

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)099

关键词

B-Physics; Nonperturbative Effects; Heavy Quark Physics

资金

  1. Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton
  2. University of Chicago
  3. Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
  4. Klaus Tschira Foundation
  5. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [05H09UME]
  6. Excellence Initiative of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate
  7. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-90ER40560]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using methods from soft-collinear and heavy-quark effective theory, a systematic factorization analysis is performed for the (B) over bar -> X-s gamma photon spectrum in the endpoint region m(b)-2E(gamma) = O(Lambda(QCD)). It is proposed that, to all orders in 1/m(b), the spectrum obeys a novel factorization formula, which besides terms with the structure H J circle times S familiar from inclusive (B) over bar -> Xul (v) over bar decay distributions contains resolved photon contributions of the form H J circle times S circle times (J) over bar and H J circle times S circle times (J) over bar circle times (J) over bar Here S and (J) over bar are new soft and jet functions, whose form is derived. These contributions arise whenever the photon couples to light partons instead of coupling directly to the effective weak interaction. The new contributions appear first at order 1/m(b) and are related to operators other than Q7(gamma) in the effective weak Hamiltonian. They give rise to non-vanishing 1/m(b) corrections to the total decay rate, which cannot be described using a local operator product expansion. A systematic analysis of these effects is performed at tree level in hard and hard-collinear interactions. The resulting uncertainty on the decay rate defined with a cut E-gamma > 1.6GeV is estimated to be approximately +/- 5%. It could be reduced by an improved measurement of the isospin asymmetry Delta(0-) to the level of +/- 4%. We see no possibility to reduce this uncertainty further using reliable theoretical methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据