4.4 Article

Leading-order determination of the gluon polarization from high-pT hadron electroproduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)130

关键词

Lepton-Nucleon Scattering

资金

  1. RBRC
  2. Desy management
  3. FWO-Flanders and IWT, Belgium
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung
  7. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  9. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  10. MEXT
  11. JSPS
  12. G-COE of Japan
  13. Dutch Foundation for Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)
  14. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  16. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  17. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  18. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  19. Russian Academy of Science
  20. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations
  21. Ministry of Economy
  22. Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetries of charged hadrons with high transverse momentum p(T) have been measured in electroproduction using the Hermes detector at HERA. Processes involving gluons in the nucleon have been enhanced relative to others by selecting hadrons with p(T) typically above 1GeV. In this kinematic domain the gluon polarization has been extracted in leading order making use of the model embedded in the Monte Carlo Generator PYTHIA 6.2. The gluon polarization obtained from single inclusive hadrons in the pT range 1GeV < p(T) < 2.5GeV using a deuterium target is Delta g/g(< x >, ) = 0.049 +/- 0.034(stat) +/- 0.010(sys-exp)(-0.099)(+0.126)(sys-models) at a scale = 1.35 GeV2 and < x > = 0.22. For different final states and kinematic domains, consistent values of Delta g/g have been found within statistical uncertainties using hydrogen and deuterium targets.

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据