4.5 Article

Discovery of interstellar ketenyl (HCCO), a surprisingly abundant radical

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 577, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526317

关键词

astrochemistry; line: identification; ISM: clouds; ISM: molecules; radio lines: ISM

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [610256: NANOCOSMOS]
  2. Spanish MINECO [CSD2009-00038, AYA2009-07304, AYA2012-32032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted radioastronomical observations of 9 dark clouds with the IRAM 30 m telescope. We present the first identification in space of the ketenyl radical (HCCO) toward the starless core Lupus-1A and the molecular cloud L483 and the detection of the related molecules ketene (H2CCO) and acetaldehyde (CH3CHO) in these two sources and 3 additional dark clouds. We also report the detection of the formyl radical (HCO) in the 9 targeted sources and of propylene (CH2CHCH3) in 4 of the observed sources, which significantly extends the number of dark clouds where these molecules are known to be present. We have derived a beam-averaged column density of HCCO of similar to 5 x 10(11) cm(-2) in both Lupus-1A and L483, which means that the ketenyl radical is just similar to 10 times less abundant than ketene in these sources. The non-negligible abundance of HCCO found implies that there must be a powerful formation mechanism able to counterbalance the efficient destruction of this radical through reactions with neutral atoms. The column densities derived for HCO, (0.5-2.7) x 10(12) cm(-2), and CH2CHCH3, (1.9-4-2) x 10(13) cm(-2), are remarkably uniform across the sources where these species are detected, confirming their ubiquity in dark clouds. Gas phase chemical models of cold dark clouds can reproduce the observed abundances of HCO, but cannot explain the presence of HCCO in Lupus-1A and L483 and the high abundances derived for propylene. The chemistry of cold dark clouds needs to be revised in light of these new observational results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据