4.4 Article

Effective field theories and matching for codimension-2 branes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/124

关键词

Renormalization Regularization and Renormalons; Large Extra Dimensions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generic for the bulk fields sourced by branes having codimension two and higher to diverge at the brane position, much as does the Coulomb potential at the position of its source charge. This complicates finding the relation between brane properties and the bulk geometries they source. (These complications do not arise for codimension-1 sources, such as in RS geometries, because of the special properties unique to codimension one.) Understanding these relations is a prerequisite for phenomenological applications involving higher-codimension branes. Using codimension-2 branes in extra-dimensional scalar-tensor theories as an example, we identify the classical matching conditions that relate the near-brane asymptotic behaviour of bulk fields to the low-energy effective actions describing how space-filling codimension-2 branes interact with the surrounding extra-dimensional bulk. We do so by carefully regulating the near-brane divergences, and show how these may be renormalized in a general way. Among the interesting consequences is a constraint relating the on-brane curvature to its action, for maximally symmetric brane geometries. It represents the codimension-2 generalization of the well-known modification of the Friedmann equation for codimension-1 branes. We argue that its interpretation within an effective field theory framework in this case is as a relation 4 pi U-2 similar or equal to kappa(2) (Tau(2)')(2) between the codimension-2 brane tension, T-2(phi), and its contribution to the low-energy on-brane effective potential, U-2(phi). This relation implies that any dynamics that minimizes a brane contribution to the on-brane curvature automatically also minimizes its couplings to the extra-dimensional scalar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据