4.5 Article

Young [α/Fe]-enhanced stars discovered by CoRoT and APOGEE: What is their origin?

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 576, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525865

关键词

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: disk; Galaxy: formation; Galaxy: stellar content; stars: fundamental parameters; asteroseismology

资金

  1. CNPq-Brazil
  2. PRIN INAF
  3. Belspo
  4. NASA [NNX12AE17G]
  5. Physics Frontier Center/JINA
  6. Physics Frontier Center/JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements (JINA-CEE) - US National Science Foundation
  7. European Research Council under the European Community [338251]
  8. Ministerio de Ciencia e Tecnologia (MCT)
  9. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  10. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  11. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  12. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  13. National Science Foundation
  14. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  15. University of Arizona
  16. Brazilian Participation Group
  17. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  18. Carnegie Mellon University
  19. University of Florida
  20. French Participation Group
  21. German Participation Group
  22. Harvard University
  23. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  24. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  25. Johns Hopkins University
  26. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  27. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  28. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  29. New Mexico State University
  30. New York University
  31. Ohio State University
  32. Pennsylvania State University
  33. University of Portsmouth
  34. Princeton University
  35. Spanish Participation Group
  36. University of Tokyo
  37. University of Utah
  38. Vanderbilt University
  39. University of Virginia
  40. University of Washington
  41. Yale University
  42. [PHY 08-22648]
  43. [PHY 14-30152]
  44. STFC [ST/M00077X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  45. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000966/1, ST/M00077X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  46. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  47. Division Of Physics [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  48. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  49. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery of a group of apparently young CoRoT red-giant stars exhibiting enhanced [alpha/Fe] abundance ratios (as determined from APOGEE spectra) with respect to solar values. Their existence is not explained by standard chemical evolution models of the Milky Way, and shows that the chemical-enrichment history of the Galactic disc is more complex. We find similar stars in previously published samples for which isochrone-ages could be reliably obtained, although in smaller relative numbers. This might explain why these stars have not previously received attention. The young [alpha/Fe]-rich stars are much more numerous in the CoRoT-APOGEE (CoRoGEE) inner-field sample than in any other high-resolution sample available at present because only CoRoGEE can explore the inner-disc regions and provide ages for its field stars. The kinematic properties of the young [alpha/Fe]-rich stars are not clearly thick-disc like, despite their rather large distances from the Galactic mid-plane. Our tentative interpretation of these and previous intriguing observations in the Milky Way is that these stars were formed close to the end of the Galactic bar, near corotation - a region where gas can be kept inert for longer times than in other regions that are more frequently shocked by the passage of spiral arms. Moreover, this is where the mass return from older inner-disc stellar generations is expected to be highest (according to an inside-out disc-formation scenario), which additionally dilutes the in-situ gas. Other possibilities to explain these observations (e.g., a recent gas-accretion event) are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据