4.6 Article

Effect of PSI-697, a Novel P-Selectin Inhibitor, on Platelet-Monocyte Aggregate Formation in Humans

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.006007

关键词

platelets; P-selectin; thrombosis

资金

  1. Translational Medicine Research Collaboration
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/06/064, CH/09/002]
  3. NHS Research Scotland through NHS Lothian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Platelet activation is central to the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Surface expression of P-selectin on activated platelets induces formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates and promotes vascular inflammation and thrombosis. P-selectin antagonism may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in vascular disease. We aimed to investigate the effects of the novel P-selectin antagonist PSI-697 on platelet-monocyte aggregate formation in humans. Methods and Results-In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, healthy smokers were randomized to receive either oral PSI-697 600 mg or matched placebo. The sequence of treatment was also randomized, with all subjects receiving both PSI-697 and placebo. Platelet-monocyte aggregates were measured by flow cytometry at 4 and 24 hours in the presence and absence of thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP; 0.1 to 1.0 mu m/L). The ex vivo addition of TRAP caused a concentration-dependent increase in platelet-monocyte aggregates from 8.2% to 94.8% (P<0.001). At 4 and 24 hours, plasma concentrations of PSI-697 increased to 1906 and 83 ng/mL, respectively (P<0.001). PSI-697 had no demonstrable effect on either stimulated or unstimulated platelet-monocyte aggregates at 4 or 24 hours (P>0.05). P-selectin-blocking antibody (CLB-Thromb6), but not PSI-697, inhibited both stimulated and unstimulated platelet-monocyte aggregate formation in vitro (P<0.001). Conclusions-The novel small-molecule P-selectin antagonist PSI-697 did not inhibit basal or stimulated platelet-monocyte aggregate formation in humans at the dose tested. Its clinical efficacy remains to be established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据