4.6 Article

Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Decreases MicroRNA-30b and MicroRNA-30c to Promote Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003905

关键词

microRNA; Runx2; smooth muscle cells; vascular calcification

资金

  1. Stanley J. Sarnoff Foundation
  2. NIH [HL112324, HL088434, HHSN268201000045C, HL097357, HL061795, HL048743, HL107192, HL108630, HL070819, HL105301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Vascular calcification resembles bone formation and involves vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) transition to an osteoblast-like phenotype to express Runx2, a master osteoblast transcription factor. One possible mechanism by which Runx2 protein expression is induced is downregulation of inhibitory microRNAs (miR). Methods and Results-Human coronary artery SMCs (CASMCs) treated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2; 100 ng/mL) demonstrated a 1.7-fold (P<0.02) increase in Runx2 protein expression at 24 hours. A miR microarray and target prediction database analysis independently identified miR-30b and miR-30c (miR-30b-c) as miRs that regulate Runx2 expression. Real-time-polymerase chain reaction confirmed that BMP-2 decreased miR-30b and miR-30c expression. A luciferase reporter assay verified that both miR-30b and miR-30c bind to the 3'-untranslated region of Runx2 mRNA to regulate its expression. CASMCs transfected with antagomirs to downregulate miR-30b-c demonstrated significantly increased Runx2, intracellular calcium deposition, and mineralization. Conversely, forced expression of miR-30b-c by transfection with pre-miR-30b-c prevented the increase in Runx2 expression and mineralization of SMCs. Calcified human coronary arteries demonstrated higher levels of BMP-2 and lower levels of miR-30b than did noncalcified donor coronary arteries. Conclusions-BMP-2 downregulates miR-30b and miR-30c to increase Runx2 expression in CASMCs and promote mineralization. Strategies that modulate expression of miR-30b and miR-30c may influence vascular calcification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据