4.5 Article

LRFD Calibration of the Ultimate Pullout Limit State for Geogrid Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 399-413

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000219

关键词

Retaining walls; Geogrid; Load and resistance factor design; Calibration; Pullout; Reliability

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Department of National Defence (Canada)
  3. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
  4. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Alaska
  5. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Arizona
  6. U.S. State Department of Transportation: California
  7. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Colorado
  8. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Idaho
  9. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Minnesota
  10. U.S. State Department of Transportation: New York
  11. U.S. State Department of Transportation: North Dakota
  12. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Oregon
  13. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Utah
  14. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Washington
  15. U.S. State Department of Transportation: Wyoming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration are reported for the pullout limit state in geogrid reinforced soil walls under self-weight loading and permanent uniform surcharge. Bias statistics are used to account for the prediction accuracy of the underlying deterministic models for load and pullout capacity and the random variability in the input parameters. The paper shows that the current AASHTO simplified method to calculate reinforcement loads under operational conditions is overly conservative leading to poor prediction accuracy of the underlying deterministic model used in LRFD calibration. Refinements to the load and default pullout capacity models in the AASHTO and Federal Highway Administration guidance documents are proposed. These models generate reasonable resistance factors using a load factor of 1.35 and give a consistent probability of pullout failure of 1%. A comparison with the allowable stress design (ASD) past practice shows that the operational factors of safety using a reliability-based LRFD approach give factors of safety greater than 1.5. Regardless of the design approach (ASD or LRFD), the analysis results demonstrate that the current empirical minimum reinforcement length criteria will likely control the design for pullout. (c) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据