4.6 Article

An Effective Methodology for Solving Matrix Games With Fuzzy Payoffs

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 610-621

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2212885

关键词

Fuzzy game theory; fuzzy number; fuzzy system model; group decision making; linear programming

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University for the Ministry of Education of China [NCET-10-0020]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20113514110009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71171055, 71101033, 71231003, 71272040, 70901021, 71001015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Of the different types of games, the matrix games with fuzzy payoffs have been extensively discussed. Two major kinds of solution methods have been devised. One is the defuzzification approach based on ranking functions. Another is the two-level linear programming method which can obtain membership functions of players' fuzzy values (or gain floor and loss ceiling). These methods cannot always ensure that players' fuzzy/defuzzified values have a common value. The aim of this paper is to develop an effective methodology for solving matrix games with payoffs expressed by trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs). In this methodology, we introduce the concept of Alpha-matrix games and prove that players' fuzzy values are always identical, and hereby, any matrix game with payoffs expressed by TrFNs has a fuzzy value, which is also a TrFN. The upper and lower bounds of any Alpha-cut of the fuzzy value and the players' optimal strategies are easily obtained through solving the derived four linear programming problems with the upper and lower bounds of Alpha-cuts of the fuzzy payoffs. In particular, the fuzzy value can be explicitly estimated through solving the auxiliary linear programming with data taken from the 1-cut and 0-cut of the fuzzy payoffs. The proposed method in this paper is illustrated with a real example and compared with other methods to show validity and applicability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据