4.2 Article

Long-Term Physiological Side Effects After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.229

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region Pays de Loire
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)
  3. Fondation de France
  4. Fondation contre la Leucemie
  5. Agence de Biomedecine
  6. Association Cent pour Sang la Vie
  7. Association Laurette Fuguain
  8. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) or stem cell transplantation has the potential to cure a significant proportion of patients with otherwise fatal diseases. At present, immediate survival is no longer the sole concern after allo-BMT, because many patients can survive the acute complications of the procedure and remain free of their original disease for several years. Although long-term allo-BMT survivors generally enjoy good health, for many others cure or control of the underlying disease is not accompanied by full restoration of health. The long-term physiologic effects after allo-BMT include nonmalignant organ or tissue dysfunction; changes in quality of life; infections related to delayed, or abnormal, immune reconstitution; and secondary cancers. These long-term complications and the features of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) symptoms are heterogeneous in nature, time of onset, duration, and severity. The underlying origin of these complications is often multifactorial, with chronic GVHD being the most challenging risk factor. The main aims of this review are to present transplant physicians and health care providers with an overview of these malignant and nonmalignant late complications, with a special focus on chronic GVHD. A close partnership between the transplant center, organ-specific specialties, and local primary care providers is a key component of preventive medicine. The patient can play a major role through engagement in health maintenance behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据