4.4 Article

A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82

关键词

Mouse inbred lines; sequence variation; mouse phenotyping; gene knockout; C57BL/6

资金

  1. European Commission [LSHG-CT-2006-037188 EUMODIC, LSHG-CT-2007-037445]
  2. Wellcome Trust [098051]
  3. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  5. French state aid [ANR-10-INBS-07]
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20231759] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [MC_UP_1502/1, MC_U142684175, MC_U142684171, MC_PC_U127561112, MC_qA137918, MC_U127561112, MC_U142684172, G1002082, G0300212, G0800024] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20231759] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Cancer Research UK [13031] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0800024, MC_PC_U127561112, G1002082, MC_U142684172, MC_qA137918, G0300212, MC_UP_1502/1, MC_U127561112, MC_U142684171, MC_U142684175] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The mouse inbred line C57BL/6J is widely used in mouse genetics and its genome has been incorporated into many genetic reference populations. More recently large initiatives such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) are using the C57BL/6N mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes. Hence both strains are now widely used in mouse genetics studies. Here we perform a comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis of the two strains to identify differences that may influence their underlying genetic mechanisms. Results: We undertake genome sequence comparisons of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N to identify SNPs, indels and structural variants, with a focus on identifying all coding variants. We annotate 34 SNPs and 2 indels that distinguish C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N coding sequences, as well as 15 structural variants that overlap a gene. In parallel we assess the comparative phenotypes of the two inbred lines utilizing the EMPReSSslim phenotyping pipeline, a broad based assessment encompassing diverse biological systems. We perform additional secondary phenotyping assessments to explore other phenotype domains and to elaborate phenotype differences identified in the primary assessment. We uncover significant phenotypic differences between the two lines, replicated across multiple centers, in a number of physiological, biochemical and behavioral systems. Conclusions: Comparison of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N demonstrates a range of phenotypic differences that have the potential to impact upon penetrance and expressivity of mutational effects in these strains. Moreover, the sequence variants we identify provide a set of candidate genes for the phenotypic differences observed between the two strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据