4.4 Article

The dissection of transcriptional modules regulated by various drugs of abuse in the mouse striatum

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r48

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [LSHM-CT-2004-005166, LSHM-CT-2007-037669, 223276 NeuroGSK3]
  2. MSHE [PBZ-MNil-2/1/2005, N N405 274137, 2 P05A 072 29]
  3. Polish-Norwegian Research Fund [PNRF-96-AI-1/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Various drugs of abuse activate intracellular pathways in the brain reward system. These pathways regulate the expression of genes that are essential to the development of addiction. To reveal genes common and distinct for different classes of drugs of abuse, we compared the effects of nicotine, ethanol, cocaine, morphine, heroin and methamphetamine on gene expression profiles in the mouse striatum. Results: We applied whole-genome microarray profiling to evaluate detailed time-courses (1, 2, 4 and 8 hours) of transcriptome alterations following acute drug administration in mice. We identified 42 drug-responsive genes that were segregated into two main transcriptional modules. The first module consisted of activity-dependent transcripts (including Fos and Npas4), which are induced by psychostimulants and opioids. The second group of genes (including Fkbp5 and S3-12), which are controlled, in part, by the release of steroid hormones, was strongly activated by ethanol and opioids. Using pharmacological tools, we were able to inhibit the induction of particular modules of drug-related genomic profiles. We selected a subset of genes for validation by in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR. We also showed that knockdown of the drug-responsive genes Sgk1 and Tsc22d3 resulted in alterations to dendritic spines in mice, possibly reflecting an altered potential for plastic changes. Conclusions: Our study identified modules of drug-induced genes that share functional relationships. These genes may play a critical role in the early stages of addiction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据