4.4 Article

Sequencing and analysis of an Irish human genome

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-9-r91

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [05/RP1/B908, 05/RP1/908/EC07, 07/SRC/B1156]
  2. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/449] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent studies generating complete human sequences from Asian, African and European subgroups have revealed population-specific variation and disease susceptibility loci. Here, choosing a DNA sample from a population of interest due to its relative geographical isolation and genetic impact on further populations, we extend the above studies through the generation of 11-fold coverage of the first Irish human genome sequence. Results: Using sequence data from a branch of the European ancestral tree as yet unsequenced, we identify variants that may be specific to this population. Through comparisons with HapMap and previous genetic association studies, we identified novel disease-associated variants, including a novel nonsense variant putatively associated with inflammatory bowel disease. We describe a novel method for improving SNP calling accuracy at low genome coverage using haplotype information. This analysis has implications for future re-sequencing studies and validates the imputation of Irish haplotypes using data from the current Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel (HGDP CEPH). Finally, we identify gene duplication events as constituting significant targets of recent positive selection in the human lineage. Conclusions: Our findings show that there remains utility in generating whole genome sequences to illustrate both general principles and reveal specific instances of human biology. With increasing access to low cost sequencing we would predict that even armed with the resources of a small research group a number of similar initiatives geared towards answering specific biological questions will emerge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据