4.6 Article

Relapse Versus Reinfection of Recurrent Tuberculosis Patients in a National Tuberculosis Specialized Hospital in Beijing, China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01858

关键词

tuberculosis; recurrence; relapse; reinfection; drug-resistant

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81672065]
  2. Tongzhou District Science and Technology Committee [KJ2017CX076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis (TB) recurrence can result from either relapse of an original infection or exogenous reinfection with a new strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). The aim of this study was to assess the roles of relapse and reinfection among recurrent TB cases characterized by a high prevalence rate of drug-resistant TB within a hospital setting. After 58 paired recurrent TB cases were genotyped to distinguish relapse from reinfection, 37 (63.8%) were demonstrated to be relapse cases, while the remaining 21 were classified as reinfection cases. Statistical analysis revealed that male gender was a risk factor for TB reinfection, odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (OR [95% CI]: 4.188[1.012-17.392], P = 0.049). Of MTB isolates obtained from the 37 relapse cases, 11 exhibited conversion from susceptible to resistance to at least one antibiotic, with the most frequent emergence of drug resistance observed to be levofloxacin. For reinfection cases, reemergence of rifampicin-resistant isolates harboring double gene mutations, of codon 531 of rpoB and codon 306 of embB, were observed. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that relapse is a major mechanism leading to TB recurrence in Beijing Chest Hospital, a national hospital specialized in TB treatment. Moreover, male patients are at higher risk for reinfection. The extremely high rate of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) among reinfection cases reflects more successful transmission of MDR-TB strains versus non-resistant strains overall.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据