4.6 Review

New Insights Into Functions and Possible Applications of Clostridium difficile CRISPR-Cas System

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01740

关键词

CRISPR; C. difficile; I-B subtype CRISPR-Cas system; prophage; CRISPR regulation; stress; antimicrobials; genome editing

资金

  1. Paris Diderot University, Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CloSTARn) [ANR-13-JSV3-0005-01]
  2. Institut Universitaire de France
  3. Pasteur-Weizmann Council
  4. University Paris-Sud
  5. Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell, Vernadski fellowship
  6. Skoltech Biomedical Initiative grant [SBI RF-0000000136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last decades the enteric bacterium Clostridium difficile (novel name Clostridioides difficile) - has emerged as an important human nosocomial pathogen. It is a leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea and represents a major challenge for healthcare providers. Many aspects of C. difficile pathogenesis and its evolution remain poorly understood. Efficient defense systems against phages and other genetic elements could have contributed to the success of this enteropathogen in the phage-rich gut communities. Recent studies demonstrated the presence of an active CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) subtype I-B system in C. difficile. In this mini-review, we will discuss the recent advances in characterization of original features of the C. difficile CRISPR-Cas system in laboratory and clinical strains, as well as interesting perspectives for our understanding of this defense system function and regulation in this important enteropathogen. This knowledge will pave the way for the development of promising biotechnological and therapeutic tools in the future. Possible applications for the C. difficile strain monitoring and genotyping, as well as for CRISPR-based genome editing and antimicrobials are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据