4.6 Article

Antiviral activity of Ladania067, an extract from wild black currant leaves against influenza A virus in vitro and in vivo

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00171

关键词

influenza A virus; plant extract; antiviral compound; in vivo; prophylactic treatment

资金

  1. German FluResearchNet
  2. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01KI1006I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza, a respiratory disease caused by influenza viruses, still represents a major threat to humans and several animal species. Besides vaccination, only two classes of drugs are available for antiviral treatment against this pathogen. Thus, there is a strong need for new effective antivirals against influenza viruses. Here , we tested Ladania067, an extract from the leaves of the wild black currant (Ribes nigrum folium) for potential antiviral activity against influenza A virus in vitro and in vivo. In the range of 0-1 mg/ml the extract showed no cytotoxic effect on three cell lines and a CC50 of 0.5 +/- 0.3 mg/ml, on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, the extract did not influence the proliferative status of human lymphocytes. In contrast, Ladania067 was highly effective (EC50 value: 49.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml) against the human pandemic influenza virus strain A/Regensburg/D6/09 (H1N1). The extract exhibited an antiviral effect when the virus was pre-incubated prior to infection or when added directly after infection. No antiviral effect was found when infected cells were treated 2,4, or 8 h after infection, indicating that Ladania067 blocks a very early step in the virus infection cycle. In the mouse infection model we were able to demonstrate that an intranasal application of 500 mu g Ladania067 inhibits progeny virus titers in the lung up to 85% after 24 h. We conclude that the extract from the leaves of the wild black currant may be a promising source for the identification of new molecules with antiviral functions against influenza virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据