4.6 Article

High throughput nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry screening of microbial growth conditions for maximal β-glucosidase production

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00365

关键词

NIMS; high throughput; beta-glucosidase; enzymatic activity screening; microbial communities

资金

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC02-050411231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Production of biofuels via enzymatic hydrolysis of complex plant polysaccharides is a subject of intense global interest. Microbial communities are known to express a wide range of enzymes necessary for the saccharification of lignocellulosic feedstocks and serve as a powerful reservoir for enzyme discovery. However, the growth temperature and conditions that yield high cellulase activity vary widely, and the throughput to identify optimal conditions has been limited by the slow handling and conventional analysis. A rapid method that uses small volumes of isolate culture to resolve specific enzyme activity is needed. In this work, a high throughput nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS)based approach was developed for screening a thermophilic cellulolytic actinomycete, Thermobispora bispora, for beta-glucosidase production under various growth conditions. Media that produced high beta-glucosidase activity were found to be I/S + glucose or microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), Medium 84 + rolled oats, and M9TE + MCC at 45 degrees C. Supernatants of cell cultures grown in M9TE + 1% MCC cleaved 2.5 times more substrate at 45 degrees C than at all other temperatures. While T bispora is reported to grow optimally at 60 degrees C in Medium 84 + rolled oats and M9TE + 1% MCC, approximately 40% more conversion was observed at 45 degrees C. This high throughput NIMS approach may provide an important tool in discovery and characterization of enzymes from environmental microbes for industrial and biofuel applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据