4.6 Article

Identity and mechanisms of alkane-oxidizing metalloenzymes from deep-sea hydrothermal vents

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00109

关键词

alkanotrophs; hydrocarbon oxidation; deep-sea hydrothermal vents; alkanes; alkane hydroxylases

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NTH 2R15GM072506]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-0616633, CHE-1148597, OCE-0327353, MCB-0456676, OCE-1136451, ANT-1103503]
  3. NSF
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1136451] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1103503] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six aerobic alkanotrophs (organism that can metabolize alkanes as their sole carbon source) isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vents were characterized using the radical clock substrate norcarane to determine the metalloenzyme and reaction mechanism used to oxidize alkanes. The organisms studied were Alcanivorax sp. strains EPR7 and MAR14, Marinobacter sp. strain EPR21, Nocardioides sp. strains EPR26w, EPR28w, and Parvibaculum hydrocarbonoclasticum strain EPR92. Each organism was able to grow on n-alkanes as the sole carbon source and therefore must express genes encoding an alkane-oxidizing enzyme. Results from the oxidation of the radical-clock diagnostic substrate norcarane demonstrated that five of the six organisms (EPR7, MAR14, EPR21, EPR26w, and EPR28w) used an alkane hydroxylase functionally similar to AlkB to catalyze the oxidation of medium-chain alkanes, while the sixth organism (EPR92) used an alkane-oxidizing cytochrome P450 (CYP)-like protein to catalyze the oxidation. DNA sequencing indicated that EPR7 and EPR21 possess genes encoding AlkB proteins, while sequencing results from EPR92 confirmed the presence of a gene encoding CYP-like alkane hydroxylase, consistent with the results from the norcarane experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据