4.7 Article

Al-2 of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans inhibits Candida albicans biofilm formation

出版社

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00094

关键词

oral microbiology; interspecies interaction; quorum sensing

资金

  1. Universitas Indonesia (RUUI), Indonesia
  2. Division for Earth and Life Sciences (ALW)
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. Young Investigator
  5. Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) [RGY0072/2007]
  6. University of Amsterdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a Gram-negative bacterium, and Candida albicans, a polymorphic fungus, are both commensals of the oral cavity but both are opportunistic pathogens that can cause oral diseases. A. actinomycetemcomitans produces a quorum-sensing molecule called autoinducer-2 (Al-2), synthesized by LuxS, that plays an important role in expression of virulence factors, in intra- but also in interspecies communication. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Al-2 based signaling in the interactions between C. albicans and A. actinomycetemcomitans. A. actinomycetemcomitans adhered to C. albicans and inhibited biofilm formation by means of a molecule that was secreted during growth. C. albicans biofilm formation increased significantly when co-cultured with A. acnnomycetemcomitans luxS, lacking Al-2 production. Addition of wild-type-derived spent medium or synthetic Al-2 to spent medium of the luxS strain, restored inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation to wild-type levels. Addition of synthetic Al-2 significantly inhibited hypha formation of C. albicans possibly explaining the inhibition of biofilm formation. Al-2 of A. actinomycetemcomitans is synthesized by LuxS, accumulates during growth and inhibits C. albicans hypha- and biofilm formation. Identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the interaction between bacteria and fungi may provide important insight into the balance within complex oral microbial communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据