4.2 Article

Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 201, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1999-7

关键词

Smell; Olfaction; Cortical thickness; Brain anatomy; MRI

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 57846]
  2. Fondation de Ste.-Justine
  3. Fondation des Etoiles
  4. NIDCD [R03DC009869]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated associations between olfactory function and gray matter thickness in 46 healthy young subjects by means of an automated technique for measuring cortical thickness. We used an extended version of the Sniffin' Sticks test to assess olfactory function, including odor threshold, concentration discrimination, quality discrimination, and odor identification. We observed a correlation between olfactory performance and cortical thickness of structures involved in earlier and later stages of chemosensory processing such as right medial orbitofrontal cortex, right insula, and adjacent cortex. Furthermore, we found significant bilateral correlations of olfactory performance with cortical thickness of areas around the central sulcus bilaterally, structures responsible for voluntary respiration and sniffing. In addition to expected general sex effects on cortical thickness, we observed areas, such as the entorhinal cortex, occipital cortex, intraparietal sulcus and insula (all in the right hemisphere), where the correlation between higher order olfactory functions and cortical thickness differed between women and men. These data demonstrate, for some neuroanatomical structures, a link between cortical thickness and olfactory function, in that thicker cortex is usually associated with better performance, but not always. This association between anatomy and olfactory performance suggests a possible biological explanation for the high degree of individual differences and sex effects observed in higher order olfactory tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据