4.5 Article

Occurrence and removal of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in a wastewater treatment plant in China.

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 1076-1082

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3em00483j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [21207140, 20921063, 21207148]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB421605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers (BZT-UVs) have previously been found in sludge from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), which might be potential sources of BZT-UVs to the surrounding environment. In this work, the occurrence and fate of seven emerging 2-hydroxyphenyl substituted BZT-UVs were investigated in a Chinese WWTP. This group of hydrophobic BZT-UVs possess log K-ow values ranging from 4.31 to 7.67 which could be associated with their fate in WWTPs. Field samples including 24 h flow composites of influent, effluent and grab sludge samples from different treatment processes were collected and analyzed. Concentrations of BZT-UVs dissolved in aqueous-phases were in the range of 4.88 +/- 1.35 (UV-234) to 34.5 +/- 12.4 ng L-1 (UV-P) in the primary influent, while only UV-P and UV328 were detected in the final effluent at concentrations of 10.5 +/- 6.59 and 2.74 +/- 1.73 ng L-1, respectively. Considering the amount of target BZT-UVs adsorbed to total suspended solids (TSS), the daily mass flux in the primary influent of the WWTP ranged from 22.3 g day(-1) (UV-P, 7.99%) to 74.0 g day(-1) (UV-234, 26.5%). Total removal efficiency of the integrated treatment process ranged from 89.7% for UV-P to 99.7% for UV-234 suggesting nearly complete removal. Organic solid sedimentation in primary and secondary clarifiers was the dominant elimination route for BZT-UV analogues, which constituted 96.3% of the total removal efficiency. Advanced treatment (using ultraviolet disinfection) in this plant might further contribute to the high removal efficiencies (ranging from 19.6% to 77.3%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据