4.8 Article

Mitotic progression, arrest, exit or death relies on centromere structural integrity, rather than de novo transcription

期刊

ELIFE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.36898

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund COMPETE 2020 [Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000029, Norte-07-0124-FEDER-000003]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [EXPL/IF/00765/2014/CP1241/CT0003]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia FCT Investigator grant [IF/00765/2014]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia FCT PhD grant [SFRH/BD/117063/2016]
  5. European Research Council Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [681443]
  6. Fundacao Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento FLAD Life Science 2020
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/117063/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have challenged the prevailing dogma that transcription is repressed during mitosis. Transcription was also proposed to sustain a robust spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) response. Here, we used live-cell imaging of human cells, RNA-seq and qPCR to investigate the requirement for de novo transcription during mitosis. Under conditions of persistently unattached kinetochores, transcription inhibition with actinomycin D, or treatment with other DNA-intercalating drugs, delocalized the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) protein Aurora B from centromeres, compromising SAC signaling and cell fate. However, we were unable to detect significant changes in mitotic transcript levels. Moreover, inhibition of transcription independently of DNA intercalation had no effect on Aurora B centromeric localization, SAC response, mitotic progression, exit or death. Mechanistically, we show that DNA intercalating agents reduce the interaction of the CPC with nucleosomes. Thus, mitotic progression, arrest, exit or death is determined by centromere structural integrity, rather than de novo transcription.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据