4.8 Article

Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in Arabidopsis

期刊

ELIFE
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00675

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG03-00ER15113, DE-FG02-04ER15517]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0924871, MCB-1024999]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-111007]
  4. National Science Foundation, Plant Systems Biology IGERT [DGE-0504645]
  5. National Institutes of Health [1RO1 GM085022]
  6. National Institutes of Health, NRSA [F32-HG004830]
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  8. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3034]
  9. Gates Millenium Scholarship
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER15517] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences
  12. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1024999] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gaseous plant hormone ethylene regulates a multitude of growth and developmental processes. How the numerous growth control pathways are coordinated by the ethylene transcriptional response remains elusive. We characterized the dynamic ethylene transcriptional response by identifying targets of the master regulator of the ethylene signaling pathway, ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 (EIN3), using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and transcript sequencing during a timecourse of ethylene treatment. Ethylene-induced transcription occurs in temporal waves regulated by EIN3, suggesting distinct layers of transcriptional control. EIN3 binding was found to modulate a multitude of downstream transcriptional cascades, including a major feedback regulatory circuitry of the ethylene signaling pathway, as well as integrating numerous connections between most of the hormone mediated growth response pathways. These findings provide direct evidence linking each of the major plant growth and development networks in novel ways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据