4.4 Article

Preferential Orientation and Surface Oxidation Control in Reactively Sputter Deposited Nanocrystalline SnO2:Sb Films: Electrochemical and Optical Results

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0171411jss

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. European Research Council under the European Community [267234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimony doped tin oxide is a versatile transparent electrical conductor. Many of its properties depend on the electronic band structure at the surface of a thin film-such as the position of the Fermi level, ionization potential I-p, optical gap energy, etc.-which in its turn is related to the surface termination given by the crystallographic orientation of the film. We prepared SnO2:Sb films by reactive DC magnetron sputtering at different oxygen/argon ratios and found by X-ray diffraction that the crystallographic orientation could be changed from tetragonal (101) to tetragonal (110) as the oxygen content was raised. Electrochemical measurements showed that this change in preferential orientation was accompanied by an increase of I-p by more than 1 eV as a result of the modification of the oxidation state of tin atoms at the film's surface. Such alterations of I-p have a large impact on the electrochemical, photocatalytic and gas sensing behavior of the material. Moreover, preferential orientation control-and hence I-p tuning-allow the tailoring of SnO2: Sb electrodes for various application by reducing the Schottky barrier. (C) The Author(s) 2014. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is not changed in any way and is properly cited. For permission for commercial reuse, please email: oa@electrochem.org. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据